![coh opposing fronts amazon coh opposing fronts amazon](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51alu2RSKqL.jpg)
I hope some of them realize how awesome it is an decide to buy it :\. A quick check of torrentspy shows that thousands of people are currently downloading it and has been snatched tens of thousands of times. Xep 22:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC) I wonder why? Maybe they decided it was futile and decided to see what happened. This is very rare in this day and age, especially for such a big release from a well known company. Is it worth mentioning that this game doesn't seem to have any copy protection (apart from cd key), or any cd check after installing. Toxic Ninja 04:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC) No copy protection
Coh opposing fronts amazon free#
Just bringing it to your attention, someone can feel free to put it in the article. 96% (thats 2% down from the highest) and editors choice AND it was on the cover of the magazine for the month.
![coh opposing fronts amazon coh opposing fronts amazon](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51aEGzYFlDL.jpg)
I knew I had seen an extremely positive review for the game (in the US version) so I check thought my last 6 issues and heres what I found: October 06, issues no. That said, I don't see how the statement can be changed without making it needlessly complicated.- Werthead 14:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC) This statement is 'technically' true in the sense that whilst no dedicated real-time strategy game has been given this high a score before (although a few have hit 91% and 92%), at least one hybrid real-time/turn-based strategy game has achieved higher (Rome: Total War achieved 95% in late 2004 and Medieval 2 did match Company of Heroes' score just a few months later). "PC Gamer UK awarded Company of Heroes 94%, the highest they have given an RTS, they also gave it a 'Must Buy' tag". Gundato 21:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC) The game was out the day you posted this. It is likely that this review is in the upcoming magazine, and THQ saw no reason to publish a different box one month after release. I just bought the game and can see the review on the box. If anyone finds something to the contrary, please fix it.
Coh opposing fronts amazon Pc#
It's also not listed on the PC Gamer review database online. Additionally, I looked through the last years worth of magazines and didn't see a review. Since this game hasn't been released, it's not possible that they reviewed it under this policy. This stems from a debacle many years ago when they gave a positive review to a game which, when shipped, was filled with bugs and flaws. PC Gamer, as a matter of policy, doesn't review games before they are completed. If anybody wants to write me a message then my email is 80.85.50.35 ( talk) 21:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC) -Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.165.2.1 ( talk
![coh opposing fronts amazon coh opposing fronts amazon](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/sgp-catalog-images/region_US/jlk71-0B8WFP7GCDB-Full-Image_GalleryBackground-en-US-1580145993797._SX720_.jpg)
However that edit was deleted, i still dont know why (i am not really familiar with wikipedia, i used to read articles, and not to post). This game breaks the rules of RTS, as, it is not as the old Age of Empires, Or Empire Earth. I posted something on that page when the game was still in beta. AS i wrote these reviews, like everybody had their ideas how come you didnt posted them? IF we are arguing on this thing for soo long, and i still see the text box that says: "This page needs rewriting." How come nobody edited the page. If they wont put some good copy protection on the game then thats it, its theirs and not ours. I think we can leave this part as the game is on the market for a good time now.ĪS for the copy protection, that is not really our problem. Since the game is in open beta, actual information on what the game plays like is known, but the article should be tagged since its still in development.- 2ltben 03:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC) Quote